I’ve been trying to critically examine why it is that I envision a microgranting model to function particularly with relational practice. If this isn’t it, at least I’m getting closer:
1. Microgrants are for people who aren’t supported by grant-giving councils (either because of eligibility or cost requirements).
2. Students aren’t eligible for funding through grant-giving councils because it is assumed they have institutional advantages provided to them through their schools; non-artists aren’t eligible because it is assumed they don’t have the artistic expertise to deliver works according to established standards of “excellence.”
3. Art schools don’t typically have formal programs for students to develop relational practice; non-artists are sometimes engaged in relational practice.
In short, I think tinygrants will meet the needs of some individuals who aren’t being served by academic institutions and/or funding councils.
This entry was written by , posted on October 8, 2009 at 10:34 PM, filed under Process and tagged academic institutions, councils, non-artists, relational practice, students. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.